What did Braun do to Taylor?

18 Min Read

In the world of music, Taylor Swift is a name that needs no introduction. From her chart-topping hits to her activism, she has made a name for herself as not just a musician, but also a voice for change. However, her journey to the top has not been without its share of controversies. In this blog post, we will delve into some of the most talked-about incidents in Taylor Swift’s career, including her feud with Apple, her battle for her Masters, and her allegations against music executive Scooter Braun. So, grab a cup of coffee and let’s take a deep dive into the world of Taylor Swift.

Did Taylor Swift outsmart Scooter Braun with song cover - Thinking of ...

Unveiling the Mysterious Act of Braun towards Taylor

Taylor Swift and Scooter Braun’s feud has been a topic of discussion for quite some time now. In June 2019, it was announced that Braun had acquired Taylor’s former record label, Big Machine Label Group, and with it, the rights to her first six albums. This news did not go well with Taylor, who took to social media to express her disappointment and anger. In a lengthy post, she alleged that she had been bullied and manipulated by Braun for years, and that the acquisition of her masters by him was her “worst case scenario”.

Taylor further accused Braun of being involved in the release of Kanye West’s song “Famous”, which features derogatory lyrics about her. She claimed that Braun had known about the song’s lyrics and had not warned her about it. This had led to a public feud between Swift and West, which had been ongoing for years.

The news of Braun’s acquisition of her masters had come as a shock to Taylor, who had been trying to buy her masters for years. She had revealed that she had been in negotiations with Big Machine Label Group, but they had fallen through. This had left her feeling helpless, as she had no control over her own music.

Overall, Taylor’s accusations against Scooter Braun had sparked a heated debate in the music industry. Many artists had come out in support of her, while others had defended Braun. The controversy had also brought to light the issue of artist ownership and control in the music industry.

>> Must read Did Heather cover up her Bret tattoo?

Apple’s Reaction to Taylor Swift’s Open Letter.

Taylor Swift’s open letter to Apple Music about the lack of artist compensation during the free three-month trial period for new subscribers was met with a prompt response from the tech giant. Apple’s Senior Vice President of Internet Software and Services, Eddy Cue, took to Twitter to publicly acknowledge Swift’s concerns and announced that Apple Music would be changing its policy. The tweet, addressed to Swift and independent artists, read, “We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie artists. Love, Apple.” This tweet was widely shared and applauded by Swift’s fans and the music industry alike. It was a clear indication that Apple was willing to listen to the concerns of artists and make necessary changes to support them. This response from Apple demonstrated a significant shift in the music industry, where artists’ voices are being heard and their concerns are being addressed by the companies they work with.

Trending now – Was Sting a member of the Four Horsemen?

How Taylor Swift Took a Stand Against Apple’s Music Policies

In 2015, Taylor Swift took on Apple Music when the company announced that it would not be paying royalties to artists during the free trial period of their service. Swift boldly spoke out against the decision, stating that it was unfair to the artists whose music would be played during that time. She wrote an open letter to Apple, criticizing the policy and announcing that she would be withholding her album, 1989, from the service. “We don’t ask you for free iPhones. Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation”, Swift wrote in her letter. Her stance was quickly supported by many other musicians, and just a day later, Apple reversed their decision and announced that they would be paying royalties to artists during the free trial period. It was another instance of Swift using her platform to advocate for the rights of artists in the music industry.

NCAA tournament team previews: North Dakota State Bison - Sports ...

A Timeline of the Alleged Groping Incident Involving Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift is a renowned American singer-songwriter, who has won several awards for her music. However, on June 2, 2013, during a meet and greet before one of her concerts, she was subjected to a traumatic experience. David Mueller, a former radio DJ, allegedly groped Swift while they were posing for a photo. This incident left Swift feeling violated and helpless, and she immediately reported it to her team. According to her statement, Mueller reached under her skirt and touched her inappropriately. This kind of behavior is unacceptable, and it is important to speak out against such actions to hold perpetrators accountable. Swift’s bravery in reporting the incident has helped to shed light on the issue of sexual assault and harassment in the entertainment industry. It is crucial to create a safe and respectful environment for all individuals, regardless of their gender or status.

Understanding the Reason Behind Taylor Swift’s Honorary Degree

Scooter Braun Addresses Taylor Swift Controversy in Lengthy Instagram Post

Taylor Swift is a well-known singer-songwriter who has made a significant impact in the music industry. Due to her immense talent and numerous achievements, she was awarded an honorary doctorate degree from New York University (NYU) in 2019. The university recognized her as “one of the most prolific and celebrated artists of her generation,” which is certainly a well-deserved honor for the pop star.

Swift joins the ranks of other esteemed recipients of honorary doctorates from NYU, including the legendary Aretha Franklin, former president Bill Clinton, and civil rights icon John Lewis. This recognition is a testament to her influence and success, as well as her contributions to the arts and culture.

It is important to note that honorary degrees do not require the recipient to complete the academic requirements of a traditional degree. Rather, they are awarded to individuals who have made significant contributions to their respective fields or to society as a whole. In Taylor Swift’s case, her contributions to the music industry and her philanthropic efforts have clearly made a lasting impact.

Understanding the Reasons Behind Taylor Swift’s Departure from Spotify

In 2014, Taylor Swift made a bold move by removing her entire music catalogue from Spotify. This decision came after she felt that the streaming site did not value her art as an artist. She believed that her music was worth more than what Spotify was paying her. Swift’s decision to remove her music from the site was not just about her own music, but also a statement regarding how she felt about the value of music created by other artists.

Swift’s action was a wake-up call for the music industry. It highlighted the issue of how streaming sites were not paying artists fairly for their music. Swift’s move was not just about making a statement but also about creating awareness among her fans and other artists in the music industry.

Swift’s decision to leave Spotify was a risky move. However, it was one that she felt was necessary to make a statement about the value of her music. Swift’s music is her art, and she believed that it deserved more than just a few pennies per stream. Her move was a statement not just about her music, but also about the value of music created by other artists.

In conclusion, Taylor Swift’s decision to remove her music from Spotify was a bold move that was aimed at bringing attention to the value of music created by artists. Her decision was a wake-up call for the music industry, and it brought to light the issue of how streaming sites were not paying artists fairly for their music. Swift’s action was a statement not just about her own music, but also about the value of music created by other artists.

Decoding Taylor Swift’s Anger towards Scooter Braun.

Taylor Swift’s anger towards Scooter Braun stems from the fact that he acquired her former record label, Big Machine Records, and with it, the rights to her first six studio albums. Swift has accused Braun of being a bully and orchestrating a “gross” takeover of her music catalog. She has also stated that she was not given the opportunity to buy her own masters before they were sold to Braun’s Ithaca Holdings for a reported $300 million.

This controversy has been ongoing since Swift first publicly voiced her frustration in 2019. She claimed that Borchetta and Braun had blocked her from performing her old songs at the American Music Awards and in a Netflix documentary about her life. This led to a public feud between Swift and Braun, with many of Swift’s fans and fellow musicians coming to her defense.

The dispute over the ownership of her masters has highlighted the issue of artists’ rights in the music industry, with many calling for greater transparency and fairness in contracts. Despite the controversy, Swift has continued to release new music and has stated that she plans to re-record her old songs in an effort to regain control over her catalog.

Insight into Scooter’s Remarks about Taylor Swift.

Scooter Braun, the owner of Big Machine Records, recently made comments regarding Taylor Swift’s decision not to buy her masters. According to Braun, he had a conversation with Swift where she expressed no interest in purchasing her masters. Braun claims that he told Swift that if any artist were interested in buying into the company, he would let her know. However, this statement has caused controversy, as Swift has publicly expressed her desire to own her masters and has been very vocal about her frustration with Braun’s ownership of them. Many fans and critics have criticized Braun for not giving Swift the opportunity to own her own music and have accused him of taking advantage of her success. The debate over artist ownership of their music continues to be a hot topic in the music industry, and this situation has only added fuel to the fire.

The Reason Behind Taylor Swift’s Decision Not to Purchase her Master Recordings

Taylor Swift is one of the most successful musicians of our time, yet she doesn’t own her masters. This might come as a surprise to many of her fans, but the reason behind this is quite simple. When Taylor was just 15, she signed a deal with Big Machine Records, which gave the record label ownership of her masters. This means that they have the exclusive rights to distribute, license, and profit from her music.

This might seem like a raw deal for Taylor, but it’s not uncommon in the music industry. In fact, most artists sign similar deals when they’re just starting out. The record label provides the resources and support needed to launch an artist’s career, and in exchange, they retain ownership of their masters.

However, Taylor’s situation is unique because of the enormous success she’s achieved. Her music has become a cultural phenomenon, and her songwriting has earned her countless awards and accolades. As a result, the value of her masters has skyrocketed, and she’s become increasingly vocal about wanting to own them.

Despite her efforts, Taylor has been unable to buy back her masters from Big Machine Records. In 2019, the label was sold to music executive Scooter Braun’s company, Ithaca Holdings, for a reported $300 million. This meant that Taylor’s masters were now owned by someone she had publicly feuded with in the past.

Taylor has since spoken out against the sale, calling it her “worst case scenario.” She even considered re-recording her entire back catalog in order to regain control of her masters. While she hasn’t gone through with that plan yet, it’s clear that owning her masters is a top priority for Taylor.

In conclusion, Taylor Swift doesn’t own her masters because of the deal she signed with Big Machine Records when she was just starting out. While this is a common industry practice, it’s become a point of contention for Taylor, who has become one of the biggest stars in the world. Despite her desire to own her masters, she’s been unable to do so, and the situation has led to public feuds and legal battles.

The Current Holders of Taylor Swift’s Recordings: An Overview of Masters Ownership.

After Scooter Braun’s acquisition of Taylor Swift’s master recordings, the music industry was shook with the news. Swift was vocal about her disagreement with the move, and it caused a lot of controversy. However, Braun has since spoken out about the situation, stating that he learned an “important lesson” from it all.

As of now, Scooter Braun’s company, Ithaca Holdings LLC, owns the master recordings of Taylor Swift’s first six albums. This means that Braun has control over the original recordings of Swift’s songs, and can make decisions regarding their use and distribution.

The ownership of her master recordings has been a contentious issue for Swift, who has spoken out against the practice of artists not owning their own music. In fact, this was one of the reasons she gave for leaving her former record label, Big Machine Label Group, and subsequently, why she was so upset with Braun’s acquisition of her masters.

Despite the controversy, it seems that as of now, Braun still holds ownership of Swift’s master recordings. However, with the recent conversation around artists owning their own music, it remains to be seen if this will continue to be the norm in the industry.

Taylor Swift has been in the news not just for her music but for her legal battles too. She fought against Apple when they refused to pay artists during their free trial period and won. She left Spotify because of their low royalty rates and was upset when Scooter Braun acquired her masters. Her ongoing feud with Scooter Braun came to light when she accused him of bullying and manipulating her for years. Despite all the controversy, Taylor Swift continues to be a strong and resilient artist who always stands up for herself and her fellow musicians.

Share This Article
Leave a comment